1:19 PM: after going through many stages, words & worlds is now being what i call blued. here i’m still engaged in it.
2:38 PM: i had a great time brushing on that blue earlier today. my sense of composition as well as my sense of pure fun guided my brush as i painted over passages in the painting that, as i gazed at it this morning, were confusing and simply didn’t work. one might say that what i just did was a radical move. and it was.
what has shown up now are shapes floating in a blue background….or is it a foreground? some of the shapes are obviously identifiable, such as the woman on the right, the striding, plaid shirted figure beside her and of course the bird. others are biomorphic, suggestive shapes., leaving the interpretation to the observer.
personally, that feature in a painting that’s well painted is all important. it’s one of the chief reasons why i so love gorky who, along with mata and others of that period, was able to create “ a palpable discrepancy between artifact and affect, appearance and intent, the manifest identity of objectand the elusive identity of the author” (robert storr writing in “Archille Gorky, a Retrospective” 2010.
is this a breakthrough, a sign of things to come or a one-off?